Re: Nightly build

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

schof-2
Martin,

Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.

sean

On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > implementation.
>
> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> > I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check into
> >>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> >>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> >>> of the core or optional tasks.
> >>
> >> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> >>
> >> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The infra
> >>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I will fix
> >>>> the build script.
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >>>> javadoc.
> >>>>
> >>>> sean
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Martin Cooper-2


On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:

> Martin,
>
> Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.

No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
"just work", though. ;-)

--
Martin Cooper


> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of the
>>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
>>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something on
>>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
>>> implementation.
>>
>> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
>> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
>> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
>>
>> --
>> Martin Cooper
>>
>>
>>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
>>>
>>> sean
>>>
>>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check into
>>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
>>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
>>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
>>>>
>>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
>>>>
>>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Cooper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> sean
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The infra
>>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
>>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I will fix
>>>>>> the build script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
>>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
>>>>>> javadoc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
>>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
>>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
>>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
>>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
>>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
>>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
>>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
>>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
>>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
>>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
>>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
>>>>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
>>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
>>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

schof-2
I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)

sean

On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Martin,
> >
> > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
>
> No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
> "just work", though. ;-)
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of the
> >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> >>> implementation.
> >>
> >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> >>>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check into
> >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> >>>>
> >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Martin Cooper
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> sean
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The infra
> >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I will fix
> >>>>>> the build script.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >>>>>> javadoc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sean
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Manfred Geiler
If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
empties the site build dir.
-Manfred

2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:

> I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
>
> sean
>
> On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> >
> > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
> > "just work", though. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > >>> implementation.
> > >>
> > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Martin Cooper
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > >>>
> > >>> sean
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check into
> > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> sean
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The infra
> > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I will fix
> > >>>>>> the build script.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> sean
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Bruno Aranda
I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...

Bruno

2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
empties the site build dir.
-Manfred

2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:

> I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
>
> sean
>
> On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> >
> > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
> > "just work", though. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> > > sean

> > >
> > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > >>> implementation.
> > >>
> > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Martin Cooper
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > >>>
> > >>> sean
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check into
> > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Martin Cooper

> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> sean
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The infra
> > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I will fix
> > >>>>>> the build script.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> sean
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

schof-2
Manfred,

I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
comparable commands for those.)

Bruno,

The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
replaced?

sean

On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
>  
>  Bruno
>
> 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > empties the site build dir.
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email] >:
> > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > >
> > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> should
> > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of
> the
> > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> (including
> > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something
> on
> > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> recall
> > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip"
> from
> > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check
> into
> > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> Ant?
> > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not
> part
> > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> infra
> > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the
> firewall
> > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I
> will fix
> > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> procedure.
> > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus
> the
> > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> synced yet.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try
> to upload
> > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir
> last
> > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc
> and javadoc
> > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the
> future.
> > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to
> the nightly build?
> > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build
> script to send
> > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Bruno Aranda
Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated files in the repository.

Bruno

2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
Manfred,

I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
comparable commands for those.)

Bruno,

The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
replaced?

sean

On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
>
>  Bruno
>
> 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that

> > empties the site build dir.
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email] >:
> > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One quick
> > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > >
> > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> should
> > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version of
> the
> > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> (including
> > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading something
> on
> > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> recall
> > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip"
> from
> > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to check
> into
> > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> Ant?
> > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not
> part
> > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> Martin Cooper

> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> infra
> > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the
> firewall
> > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then I
> will fix
> > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> procedure.
> > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus
> the
> > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> synced yet.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try
> to upload
> > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir
> last
> > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc
> and javadoc
> > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the
> future.
> > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to
> the nightly build?
> > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[hidden email]>:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build
> script to send
> > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Manfred Geiler
Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
-Manfred

2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:

> Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> files in the repository.
>  
>  Bruno
>
>
> 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > Manfred,
> >
> > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > comparable commands for those.)
> >
> > Bruno,
> >
> > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > replaced?
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > >
> > >  Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> quick
> > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> files
> > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> so
> > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > should
> > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > (including
> > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> something
> > > on
> > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> svn
> > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > recall
> > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> 0.9.13.zip"
> > > from
> > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> check
> > > into
> > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > Ant?
> > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> not
> > > part
> > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > infra
> > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> the
> > > firewall
> > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> I
> > > will fix
> > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > procedure.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> plus
> > > the
> > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> build-site.xml
> > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > synced yet.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> try
> > > to upload
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> dir
> > > last
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> tldoc
> > > and javadoc
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> the
> > > future.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> to
> > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> build
> > > script to send
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

Bruno Aranda
I am just beginning with svn, but what I found is if you svn delete a file and add again the same file, svn thinks that this is a replacement and does not compare both files. I think this is the price you must pay if you delete all the files first... if there was a way to svn delete only the old files, maybe you could do that comparing versions after commit, but I don't know if this is easy to achieve...

Bruno


2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
-Manfred

2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:

> Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> files in the repository.
>
>  Bruno
>
>
> 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > Manfred,
> >
> > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > comparable commands for those.)
> >
> > Bruno,

> >
> > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > replaced?
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > >
> > >  Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> quick
> > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> files
> > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> so
> > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > >

> > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > should
> > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > (including
> > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> something
> > > on
> > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> svn
> > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > >>

> > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > recall
> > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> 0.9.13.zip"
> > > from
> > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> check
> > > into
> > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > Ant?
> > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its

> not
> > > part
> > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > infra
> > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> the
> > > firewall
> > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> I
> > > will fix
> > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > procedure.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> plus
> > > the
> > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> build-site.xml
> > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > synced yet.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> try
> > > to upload
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> dir
> > > last

> > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> tldoc
> > > and javadoc
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> the
> > > future.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> to
> > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur

> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> build
> > > script to send
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

bgoodin
In reply to this post by Manfred Geiler
This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
the SVN manual.  http://svnbook.red-bean.com/

Brandon

On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:
> > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > files in the repository.
> >
> >  Bruno
> >
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > > Manfred,
> > >
> > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > comparable commands for those.)
> > >
> > > Bruno,
> > >
> > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > replaced?
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > >
> > > >  Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > -Manfred
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> > quick
> > > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > files
> > > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> > so
> > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > should
> > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > (including
> > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> > something
> > > > on
> > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > svn
> > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > recall
> > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > from
> > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> > check
> > > > into
> > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > not
> > > > part
> > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > > infra
> > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > the
> > > > firewall
> > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> > I
> > > > will fix
> > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > plus
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > try
> > > > to upload
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > dir
> > > > last
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > tldoc
> > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > the
> > > > future.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > to
> > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > build
> > > > script to send
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

schof-2
Brandon,

I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
and over again?  If so, I agree with you.  My plan was to do a regular
delete and then commit.  TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
does not.  So I am stuck.

Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
Ant if possible.

sean


On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> the SVN manual.  http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
>
> Brandon
>
> On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:
> > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > files in the repository.
> > >
> > >  Bruno
> > >
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > > > Manfred,
> > > >
> > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > >
> > > > Bruno,
> > > >
> > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > replaced?
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > >
> > > > >  Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> > > quick
> > > > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > files
> > > > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> > > so
> > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > something
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > svn
> > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> > > check
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > not
> > > > > part
> > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > the
> > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> > > I
> > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > plus
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > try
> > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > dir
> > > > > last
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > tldoc
> > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > the
> > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > to
> > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > build
> > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

bgoodin
Sorry,  I was responding to Manfred. I think i came in on the middel
of a conversation without knowing the context ;-) my bad :D.

"Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
single file regardless if it was really changed or not."

I was simply saying that the change is maintained on the commit. It is
not maintained based on the number of files that have changed. So, if
you changed 20 files, deleted 10 and replaced 4  the overall version
number would only increment by 1 if you perform it in 1 commit.

Brandon

On 5/13/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Brandon,
>
> I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
> and over again?  If so, I agree with you.  My plan was to do a regular
> delete and then commit.  TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
> does not.  So I am stuck.
>
> Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
> Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
> Ant if possible.
>
> sean
>
>
> On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> > subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> > repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> > repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> > changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> > the SVN manual.  http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:
> > > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > > files in the repository.
> > > >
> > > >  Bruno
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Manfred,
> > > > >
> > > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno,
> > > > >
> > > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > > replaced?
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> > > > quick
> > > > > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > > files
> > > > > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > > something
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > > svn
> > > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> > > > check
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > > not
> > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > > the
> > > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> > > > I
> > > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > > plus
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > > try
> > > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > > dir
> > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > > tldoc
> > > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > > the
> > > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > > to
> > > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > > build
> > > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nightly build

schof-2
Gotcha.

On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Sorry,  I was responding to Manfred. I think i came in on the middel
> of a conversation without knowing the context ;-) my bad :D.
>
> "Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> single file regardless if it was really changed or not."
>
> I was simply saying that the change is maintained on the commit. It is
> not maintained based on the number of files that have changed. So, if
> you changed 20 files, deleted 10 and replaced 4  the overall version
> number would only increment by 1 if you perform it in 1 commit.
>
> Brandon
>
> On 5/13/05, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Brandon,
> >
> > I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
> > and over again?  If so, I agree with you.  My plan was to do a regular
> > delete and then commit.  TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
> > does not.  So I am stuck.
> >
> > Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
> > Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
> > Ant if possible.
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> > > subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> > > repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> > > repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> > > changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> > > the SVN manual.  http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> > >
> > > Brandon
> > >
> > > On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > > > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > > > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > > > files in the repository.
> > > > >
> > > > >  Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > > Manfred,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > > > files are to be deleted.  Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc.  Are you
> > > > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > > > replaced?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < [hidden email] >:
> > > > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > > > defunct files.  So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > > > commit.  Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Never mind.  I got it working so I don't need the distro.  One
> > > > > quick
> > > > > > > > > > > question though.  Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > > > files
> > > > > > > > > > > that were already checked in.  We're rebuilding our website and
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well?  I couldn't get a binary version
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.)  I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > > > something
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > > > svn
> > > > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK.  I have SVN working at my office now.  Next step is to
> > > > > check
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant.  Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.  The
> > > > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.)  I need to get that resolved ASAP.  Then
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > > > plus
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > > > try
> > > > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > > > dir
> > > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > > > tldoc
> > > > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>  * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < [hidden email]>:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > > > build
> > > > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>